***** New June 21st, 2019 ***** This branch aims to support Python3, which is developed under Python3.5 and PyTorch1.0. ATTENTION: To use this version of code, please download nl2sql_char_embedding_py3.zip to use, instead of nl2sql_char_embedding_baseline.zip. ***** New June 18st, 2019 ***** This version of release supports execution accuracy, which gets the execution result of predicted SQL. This requires records==0.5.3 before running. ## Introduction This baseline method is developed and refined based on code of SQLNet, which is a baseline model in WikiSQL. The model decouples the task of generating a whole SQL into several sub-tasks, including select-number, select-column, select-aggregation, condition-number, condition-column and so on. Simple model structure shows here, implementation details could refer to the origin paper.
The difference between SQLNet and this baseline model is, Select-Number and Where-Relationship sub-tasks are added to adapt this Chinese NL2SQL dataset better. ## Dependencies - Python 2.7 - torch 1.0.1 - records 0.5.3 - tqdm ## Start to train Firstly, download the provided datasets at ~/data_nl2sql/, which should include train.json, train.tables.json, val.json, val.tables.json and char_embedding, and divide them in following structure. ``` ├── data_nl2sql │ ├── train │ │ ├── train.db │ │ ├── train.json │ │ ├── train.tables.json │ ├── val │ │ ├── val.db │ │ ├── val.json │ │ ├── val.tables.json │ ├── test │ │ ├── test.db │ │ ├── test.json │ │ ├── test.tables.json │ ├── char_embedding.json ``` and then ``` mkdir ~/nl2sql cd ~/nl2sql/ git clone https://github.com/ZhuiyiTechnology/nl2sql_baseline.git cp -r ~/data_nl2sql/* ~/nl2sql/nl2sql_baseline/data/ cd ~/nl2sql/nl2sql_baseline/ sh ./start_train.sh 0 128 ``` while the first parameter 0 means gpu number, the second parameter means batch size. ## Start to evaluate To evaluate on val.json or test.json, make sure trained model is ready, then run ``` cd ~/nl2sql/nl2sql_baseline/ sh ./start_test.sh 0 pred_example ``` while the first parameter 0 means gpu number, the second parameter means the output path of prediction. ## Experiment result We have run experiments several times, achiving avegrage 27.5% logic form accuracy on the val dataset, with 128 batch size. ## Experiment analysis We found the main challenges of this datasets containing poor condition value prediction, select column and condition column not mentioned in NL question, inconsistent condition relationship representation between NL question and SQL, etc. All these challenges could not be solved by existing baseline and SOTA models. Correspondingly, this baseline model achieves only 77% accuracy on condition column and 62% accuracy on condition value respectively even on the training set, and the overall logic form is only around 50% as well, indicating these problems are challenging for contestants to solve.
## Related resources: https://github.com/salesforce/WikiSQL https://yale-lily.github.io/spider Semantic Parsing with Syntax- and Table-Aware SQL Generation